Aixin Huo
Blog 2
ASA 2 - Section A01
October 2, 2015
In the Berkeley
Free Speech Movement’s article, the author said, “the Berkeley activists who
led the Free Speech Movement pioneered a new brand of student politics. They
brought the daring, non-violent protest tactics of the civil rights movement to
campus and proved that these tactics could be as effective in fighting
political censorship” and “its victory fostered a new spirit of activism among
students by eroding the fears they had inherited from the tense.” In 1964
Berkeley, students in UC Berkeley gathered together to fight for their own
rights and they got the success. People later considered this event as
“movement”. However, in 1989 Beijing, Chinese college students also gathered
together to fight for their democracy and freedom. But the result was such a
tragedy. People later considered this event as “protest”. The Chinese
government, the media in China, even Chinese people all “forgot” this “students
protest”; no one talks about it. One of my mom’s classmates at that time
attended the protest and she returned back to China recently from United
States. She has a lovely family in United States and yes, a happy life. But
some others students at that protest were died on June 4th accident.
No one commemorates them or honor their braveness in public. The students in
Berkeley on 1964 and the students in Beijing in 1989 were basically doing the
same thing: fight for their rights. But the outcome was totally different. I
have no rights to judge the reaction Chinese government had at that time to the
student’s movement, because I had no idea what exactly happened in front of the
Tiananmen Square in 1989. But I do feel deeply sad for the students who died in
the movement.
The difference
between these two student’s movements properly can show the reason why many Chinese
or even Asian loved to immigrate to United States. At least, they won’t die because
they want to speak out loud their thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment