Lixian Huang
Oct 11th. 2015
Week 4 Blog
ASA 2, A03
Ferdrik deBoer in the article “Why We Should Fear University,
Inc” mentions that our universities operate increasingly like corporations
nowadays, in which, students and professors act like customers and servants. DeBoer
emphasizes that critics embrace “an unhealthy sensitivity” to the “pre-empt
potentially unpopular ideas” but are silent to the ones “that are actually
expressed”. According to DeBoer, passionate students can be misguided by the
administrators to act against the “intellectual freedom” on campus. DeBoer
thinks that a future of a “sanitized and smoothed” university is horrifying,
and he calls for a new and human campus politics.
I was astonished when I first saw the example deBoer gave about
Laura Kipnis in his article—a group of students managed to censor a professor
at Northwestern University simply because of a disagreement on ideas. I can
fully understand deBoer’s fear about answering complaints in dean’s office,
because what the Kipnis example shows is that professors have to be very
careful about their argument, otherwise they can be severely punished. I agree
deBoer that universities should be places where advanced ideas transmit between
professors and students. As a student, I am willing to hear different ideas and
disagreements, because I will be able to absorb those advanced sparks to mature
my points of view, even if we are not at a same standpoint.
Question: How can the students identify the misguidance
from the university administrators, and eliminate similar “Kipnis tragedy”
happen again?
No comments:
Post a Comment