Andrew Nguyen
ASA 002 A03
Week 5
While reading Andrew Priest’s From Saigon to Baghdad: The Vietnam Syndrome, the Iraq War and American
Foreign Policy, I was surprised to learn how much the Vietnam War impacted
the United States in ways other than just a decrease in morale. The Vietnam
syndrome’s set of criteria means nothing as the US keeps meddling into other
countries’ business. The US is brushing off guidelines to help them make
smarter decisions in foreign policy. If this pattern keeps up, how could we
learn from past mistakes? Another issue that the article points out is that the
Vietnam War showed how insignificant popular sovereignty is. Although the large
majority of the population did not agree with intervention in Vietnam, that did
not matter as it was the President who is the ultimate authority. I feel like
this exemplifies hegemony within the US. The US government establishes a sense
of patriotism and freedom for its citizens by giving them rights, including the
right to vote, but, in reality, the ordinary citizen has very little power. Furthermore,
the citizens think their interests align with that of the government while the
government acts on its own, without the input of the citizens. Did the war
intensify hegemony within the US?
No comments:
Post a Comment