Jeff Cha
ASA 2 (A02)
Blog 5
In Hamamoto’s “Empire of Death and the Plague of Civic
Violence,” he mentions Aileen Wuornos and how “unlike her male
counterparts who thrill in their acts of sexual predation, it is more likely
that Wuornos ‘lashed out against her victims in a rage that originated in
decades of abusive and debilitating encounters with men that began in her early
childhood.’ ” This part of the reading gives the impression that only Wuornos
is able to claim
childhood abuse as a strong influence on her crimes. Since she is a woman and her crimes were not
of a sexual nature, the assumption is that there must be a reason behind it. Sexual,
physical and verbal abuse during anyone’s childhood can play an important part
in their behavior. It’s not like men are
naturally sexual predators who decide to rape and kill because of those urges. Of
course childhood abuse doesn’t excuse the actions of serial killers because there
are many other factors or situations to consider. Hamamoto does mention how the violent
fantasies of Ricardo Ramirez may have been influenced by an older cousin who shared
similar stories when Ricardo was younger. This shows that my interpretation of
Hamamoto’s writing on Wuornos may have just been a misunderstanding. Nonetheless, I believe it’s reasonable to
think that there are explanations for everyone’s actions regardless of gender
or race. Any issue brought up should be considered carefully and logically.
In the
fight for equality between men and women, it seems like discrimination against
men is sometimes overlooked. Are there similarities between this and the issues
of Asian Americans where racial discrimination is also unnoticed? Are both
sides expected to ignore these issues that are seen as not a big deal?
No comments:
Post a Comment