Danny Wong
ASA 002
May 4, 2014
Reading Blog 6
A Price for a Broken
System
Upon
reading about the Patriot Act 2 I thought about what the Patriot Act 1 was
about. The main point of I was to provide better security to the United States
from encountering another terrorist incident. I thought by having the same name
it would be an evolution to how to prevent the issue at a more efficient rate,
but I was wrong. The Patriot Act 2 is pretty much a big brother type scenario
like in the book 1984 by George Orwell. It gives the government more power to
do whatever they like. From the article it states that it will “relax the
procedural safeguards protecting citizens from widespread government
surveillance such as warrantless wiretaps on telephones…” Anyone in the United
States can clearly say that is a violation of our privacy and it is
unconstitutional which I agree upon. I like the fact that the main idea is to
provide a better security to the people, but not at a cost like this. The
scariest part to me was section 101 of the Patriot Act 2. In this particular
section it stated that “allowing approval for such surveillance with only the
merest evidence of a crime—even if that crime has no relationship to terrorist
organizations or activities.” Essentially people usually get spied on if they
are related to certain terrorist acts, but this section shows that anyone could
be under surveillance if they have committed a misdemeanor. How is that even a
fair punishment for the person being spied on. I believe the United States need
to focus more on making the current security measures more effective and stop
trying to use the term “terrorism protection” to fool people into giving up
their constitutional rights.
Question: Do you think it is worth giving up part of your rights for a bit of extra security?
No comments:
Post a Comment