Name:Weitang Liu
Blog #4
The article "A Tale of Two
Campuses: Berkeley and Davis respond to Occupy movements" shows different
ways of solving the similar problems in their campuses among two UCs. I can
sense the authors angry by his comparison between those UCs. By drawing the
parallel that UC Berkeley focuses on solving the problems of high tuition and fees,
while UCD chancellor only complained about the budget cutting in recent years
and accused the students of damaging, he made the point that "Why Davis chose to ignore this issue in
its public communications about damages caused by the Occupy students, while Berkeley
ignored any such damages and responded to the need for lower costs of education
remains a mystery.
" I think he somehow feel
angry and sarcastic towards the things UCD administrators did.
When I google online, I am very
surprised by a recent news titled as "UC Davis pepper-spray officer
awarded $38,000" written by Joe Garofoli.
I think it is very self-explanatory. I do not understand why the police
was awarded because his violence towards the students. I am not saying that the
students were 100% doing right, but the polices were only "doing their
jobs" ordered by the university administrators.
Question: Is there any real differences as more administrators come into play?
No comments:
Post a Comment