In response to, “Empire of Death and the Plague of Civic
Violence.”
In this article, Dr. Hammamoto gives multiple examples from
a variety of different time periods to show how militarism and a given milieu
can affect murder and how society reacts to it. As the article progressed, it
was evident that more and more of the murders were associated with the guns and
war. As interesting as the article was, I couldn’t help but finding myself
upset and shocked at how gruesome a few of the examples were. I am not sure if
what sickened me was the detail given in each example, or the overall fact of
how Dr. Hammamoto was able to tie the killers to those with power. However, I
was most shocked when the article gave an example of how Richard Nixon gave
orders for the bombing of neutral nations during the Vietnam War. Whatever the
outcome he expected, or motive, this example made Dr. Hammamoto’s point of how
elite policy intellectuals and government bureaucrats are similar to mass
murderers proven to me. Furthermore, these actions are not done without any “blowback”
as the article ends by describing recent terrorism and how our nation “reaps
what it sows.” When those with power act with similarly to the murderers listed
in the article, our nation follows by producing anarchy.
Question: Is the comparison between those with power and
mass murderers correct? Do you think certain decisions by those with power
truly affect how the entire nation thinks and how each individual acts?
Aaron Handa
Section A02
No comments:
Post a Comment